A dietitian wants to convince a patient to lose weight. Which statement below best communicates a scientific argument that justifies the need for weight loss?
- A. Losing weight can lower blood pressure, increase energy levels, and promote overall health.
- B. Society tends to treat overweight people unfairly.
- C. Members of the opposite sex are more interested in people who maintain a healthy weight.
- D. Losing weight is easy to do.
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Choice A is the correct answer as it provides a scientific argument supported by evidence. Losing weight has been shown to lower blood pressure, increase energy levels, and promote overall health. These are concrete health benefits that can be objectively measured and monitored. Choices B and C do not offer scientific justifications for weight loss but rather focus on societal perceptions and personal relationships. Choice D is incorrect as losing weight is not always easy and may require significant effort and lifestyle changes.
You may also like to solve these questions
In the 18th century, women were more likely to die in childbirth compared to the 21st century. What is a possible explanation for why women are less likely to die in childbirth in the present age?
- A. Doctors are better equipped to perform cesarean sections.
- B. Doctors have more tools to monitor mothers during childbirth, enabling earlier detection of complications.
- C. Doctors practice good hand hygiene to prevent the transfer of germs and infections.
- D. All of the statements above provide reasonable explanations for the decrease in mortality during childbirth.
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: All options are valid explanations for the decrease in maternal mortality during childbirth in modern times. Improved medical knowledge and technology have enabled doctors to perform cesarean sections more effectively, monitor mothers more closely for early detection of complications, and maintain better hygiene practices to reduce the risk of infections. Therefore, all the given statements collectively contribute to the reduction in maternal mortality rates in the 21st century.
Which blood component is responsible for the production of antibodies?
- A. Platelets
- B. Red blood cells
- C. White blood cells
- D. Plasma cells
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: White blood cells, specifically B lymphocytes or B cells, are responsible for producing antibodies as part of the immune response. When the body encounters foreign substances (antigens), B cells are activated to differentiate into plasma cells, which then produce antibodies to target and neutralize the antigens. Platelets are involved in blood clotting and not in antibody production. Red blood cells are primarily responsible for carrying oxygen in the blood and do not produce antibodies. Plasma cells are actually differentiated B cells that produce antibodies, but the question asks for the blood component responsible for the production of antibodies, which is the white blood cells.
Which of the following is true regarding T cells?
- A. They are only seen in individuals with leukemia.
- B. They are a specialized type of white blood cell.
- C. They mature in the thymus.
- D. They play a role in the immune response.
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D: T cells are a specialized type of white blood cell that play a crucial role in the immune response. They are produced in the bone marrow and mature in the thymus gland. T cells help coordinate and regulate the immune response to pathogens and foreign substances by interacting with other immune cells. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect. T cells are not exclusively seen in individuals with leukemia; they are a normal component of the immune system found in healthy individuals. While it is true that T cells are a specialized type of white blood cell, the key characteristic being tested in this question is their role in the immune response. Lastly, T cells do mature in the thymus, but this alone does not encompass the full scope of their function in the immune system.
A researcher is studying the response of bacteria to a certain chemical. In three experiments, the bacteria swim towards the chemical, and in one experiment, the bacteria swim away from it. What would be the most appropriate next step for the researcher?
- A. Report only the first three experiments.
- B. Report all the experiments, but refrain from making any conclusions.
- C. Repeat the experiment several more times and apply a statistical analysis to the data.
- D. Repeat the experiment, adding a new chemical to determine its effect on the bacteria.
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: Repeating the experiment multiple times and applying statistical analysis would help ensure the results are reliable. By doing so, the researcher can validate the observed trends and determine the significance of the bacteria's response to the chemical. This approach would enhance the credibility of the findings and allow for more robust conclusions to be drawn. Reporting only the first three experiments (Choice A) would overlook critical data that could provide a comprehensive understanding of the bacteria's response. Refraining from making any conclusions (Choice B) would not utilize the available data effectively. Adding a new chemical in a repeated experiment (Choice D) would deviate from focusing on analyzing the response to the original chemical, introducing unnecessary variables.
The average life expectancy at birth in the United States at the beginning of the 21st century was about 75 years. The average life expectancy at birth in the middle of the 19th century was only about 40 years. Which of the following factors are likely to have contributed to the longer life expectancy in the 21st century? (Select the one that does not apply)
- A. The human body has evolved to become more resilient to its environment.
- B. There have been numerous advances in medical technology and treatments.
- C. Higher standards of basic cleanliness have helped people avoid illness.
- D. The creation of vaccines has nearly eliminated certain diseases that were once deadly.
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Medical advances, higher standards of cleanliness, and the creation of vaccines have all significantly contributed to the increase in life expectancy over time. While human evolution plays a role in adaptation to the environment over millennia, it is not a primary factor that has led to the substantial increase in life expectancy within a few centuries. The human body's evolution is a slow process that occurs over generations, while the advancements in medical technology, cleanliness, and vaccines have had a more immediate and direct impact on improving life expectancy.