Nokea
A nurse has been providing care for a 69-year-old female client who has recently had her right foot amputated as a result of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer. The nurse undertook to perform debridement of the wound despite her lack of relevant education and experience. The client experienced permanent nerve damage as a result of the nurse's misguided efforts. Which category of legal liability is most likely relevant in this case?
- A. Larceny
- B. Assault
- C. Invasion of privacy
- D. Negligence
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: In this case, the most likely relevant category of legal liability is negligence. Negligence involves the commission of an improper act, as exemplified by the nurse's actions of performing a procedure without the necessary education and experience, leading to permanent nerve damage for the client. Larceny refers to theft, assault involves a deliberate threat to harm, and invasion of privacy pertains to the violation of a person's right to privacy. Therefore, in this scenario, the nurse's actions align more closely with negligence.
You may also like to solve these questions
A nurse cares for an Asian American client with a fractured femur. During shift report, which statement by the nurse will another nurse challenge?
- A. The client has requested to wait to receive pain medication.
- B. The client does not want family to visit the room.
- C. The client is a recent immigrant to this country.
- D. The client is stoic and will not complain at all.
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D. Stereotyping the client as stoic and unlikely to complain about pain is incorrect and can lead to inadequate pain management. It is essential for the nurse to assess and address the client's pain regardless of cultural background. Choices A, B, and C are not as critical as they respect the client's autonomy, cultural preferences regarding family visits, and provide relevant background information about the client's immigrant status.
An investigation into reports of substandard care on the subacute geriatric unit of a hospital has been undertaken. Which of the following events is representative of malpractice on the part of the nursing staff?
- A. A client with a documented history of seizures was left with his bed raised and with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury
- B. A client was sent for a colonoscopy, after which it was learned that the client had never given written consent for the procedure
- C. A client with a diagnosis of vascular dementia was found wandering in the hall outside the unit
- D. An immobile client was not turned over the course of a night shift and developed a pressure ulcer on her coccyx
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Answer A is correct as it includes all the components of malpractice: duty, negligence, and injury. The nursing staff failed in their duty by leaving a client with a documented history of seizures unattended with bedrails not in place, resulting in a fall and head injury. Answer B involves an issue related to consent, which is the responsibility of the physician, not the nursing staff. Answer C does not demonstrate negligence or harm caused by the nursing staff. Answer D also shows negligence by failing to turn an immobile client, leading to a pressure ulcer, but it lacks a direct connection to the duty of the nursing staff in preventing harm.
A gerontological nurse is conducting an in-service program for a group of nurses who work with a wide range of culturally diverse older adults. After teaching the group about the impact of culture on health and illness, the nurse determines that the teaching was successful when the group identifies which reason as underlying the need to understand culture?
- A. Ensure that clients receive the respect customary in their own ethnic group
- B. Provide individualized and culturally sensitive care
- C. Ensure that medical treatments align with cultural expectations
- D. Increase compliance among minority clients
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B because understanding the impact of culture on health and illness enables nurses to provide individualized and culturally sensitive care to older adults from diverse backgrounds. This approach ensures that the cultural, religious, and sexual orientation differences of older adults are acknowledged, respected, and factored into their care. Choice A is not as comprehensive as B, as the goal goes beyond just respecting customary practices. Choice C, while important, is more focused on medical treatments rather than holistic care. Choice D is not the primary reason for understanding culture; the main goal is to provide personalized care that respects individual differences.
A nurse is providing end-of-life care to an older female client who practices Judaism. Which intervention would the nurse identify as potentially problematic for this client and her family?
- A. The client requires transfusions of packed red blood cells during care.
- B. Assessment by a male health care provider was required.
- C. An autopsy was ordered due to the client's unique disease etiology.
- D. A do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order was recommended by the care team.
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C. Autopsy is often opposed in the context of Jewish religious and cultural beliefs, as it is seen as desecration of the body. While a person who is a Jehovah's Witness would be opposed to blood transfusions (choice A), a Muslim client may prefer to be cared for by someone of the same gender (choice B). A DNR order (choice D) is not noted to be a particular issue in the context of Jewish culture.
Which of the following is required in order for a healthcare provider to be legally justified in not attempting to save a client's life?
- A. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' (DNR) statement on the patient's care plan
- B. A 'No-Code' sign or symbol placed at the patient's bedside
- C. A 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet
- D. The next of kin's request for 'Do Not Resuscitate' orally or in writing
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: To legally justify not attempting to save a client's life, a healthcare provider must have a 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet. Unless there is a specific order stating that resuscitation should not be performed, failure to do so can be considered negligence. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' statement on the care plan or a symbol at the bedside is not legally valid without the proper medical order. Additionally, a request from the next of kin, whether oral or written, is not a substitute for a signed physician's order.