Nokea
A nurse is providing end-of-life care to an older female client who practices Judaism. Which intervention would the nurse identify as potentially problematic for this client and her family?
- A. The client requires transfusions of packed red blood cells during care.
- B. Assessment by a male health care provider was required.
- C. An autopsy was ordered due to the client's unique disease etiology.
- D. A do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order was recommended by the care team.
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C. Autopsy is often opposed in the context of Jewish religious and cultural beliefs, as it is seen as desecration of the body. While a person who is a Jehovah's Witness would be opposed to blood transfusions (choice A), a Muslim client may prefer to be cared for by someone of the same gender (choice B). A DNR order (choice D) is not noted to be a particular issue in the context of Jewish culture.
You may also like to solve these questions
A nurse is reading a journal article about life expectancy and various cultural groups. The article describes statistics, stating that a baby born to a black American couple has a life expectancy lower than that of a baby born to a white American couple. The article goes on to describe the life expectancy as the babies get older. Which finding would the nurse most likely identify as reflecting the life expectancy of the baby born to the black American couple by the seventh decade?
- A. Beginning to equal that of similarly aged white elders
- B. Exceeding that of similarly aged white older adults
- C. Dropping to less than half that of similarly aged white older adults
- D. Rising above that of white older adults until age 75 and then dropping
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Historically, black Americans have experienced a lower standard of living and less access to health care than their white counterparts, leading to a lower life expectancy. However, by the seventh decade of life, survival rates for black individuals begin to equal that of similarly aged white individuals. Choice B is incorrect as it indicates a higher life expectancy for black individuals, which is not supported by the information provided. Choice C is incorrect as it suggests a drastic decrease in life expectancy for black individuals, which is not in line with the trend described. Choice D is incorrect as it implies a temporary increase in life expectancy for black individuals until age 75, which is not supported by the information that survival rates begin to equal by the seventh decade.
How does guardianship differ from power of attorney?
- A. The court appoints a guardian; an individual grants a power of attorney to someone else to make decisions on his or her behalf.
- B. Guardianship is legally binding whether or not an individual is competent; power of attorney applies only to the incompetent.
- C. Courts monitor the actions of those executing a power of attorney, but guardians are free to act on behalf of another as long as standards of 'reasonable prudence' are met.
- D. Guardianship stays in effect for one calendar year and must be renewed annually; power of attorney stays in effect until one or both parties choose to revoke it.
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A. The key difference between guardianship and power of attorney is that the court appoints a guardian to make decisions on behalf of an individual who is deemed incompetent, while an individual grants a power of attorney to someone else to make decisions on their behalf when they are competent. Choice B is incorrect because both guardianship and power of attorney can apply to individuals who are competent or incompetent. Choice C is incorrect as guardians, like those with power of attorney, must act in the best interest of the individual they represent, and the level of oversight can vary. Choice D is incorrect as guardianship and power of attorney do not have fixed time limits; they remain in effect until revoked or ended by the appropriate legal process.
During a busy shift, a registered nurse directed an unlicensed care provider to change the dressing and perform wound care on an older adult client's surgical incision, an act that exists outside of the unlicensed care provider's scope of practice. Which of the following statements best captures the legal context of this event?
- A. The unlicensed care provider is solely responsible for the inappropriate practice.
- B. The nurse can be held liable for the actions of the unlicensed care provider.
- C. Liability rests with the nurse manager of the unit.
- D. In the absence of documented harm to the client, the action is legally permissible.
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B. Under the doctrine of respondent superior, nurses can be held liable for the actions of individuals under their supervision. In this scenario, the registered nurse directed the unlicensed care provider to perform a task outside their scope of practice, making the nurse accountable for the consequences. Choice A is incorrect because the responsibility is shared between the nurse and the unlicensed care provider. Choice C is incorrect as the nurse manager may not be directly responsible for the actions of the registered nurse. Choice D is incorrect because legality is not determined solely by the absence of harm; acting within one's legal scope of practice is essential to ensure patient safety.
An older adult client from a minority culture refuses to eat at the nursing home, stating, 'I just do not like the food here.' What factor should the staff assess for this problem?
- A. The client does not like eating with other residents of the home.
- B. The client is using this as an excuse to go home.
- C. The food served may not be culturally appropriate.
- D. The food served may violate religious beliefs.
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C. Residents in long-term care settings often have limited food choices, which may not align with their cultural preferences. When assessing why a client is refusing to eat, it is essential to consider if the food served is culturally appropriate. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect. There is no indication in the scenario that the client's refusal to eat is due to not liking to eat with other residents, using it as an excuse to go home, or violating religious beliefs.
Which of the following family interactions would the nurse most likely interpret as being atypical?
- A. Mr. R states that he and his brother always had a cordial, though somewhat distant, relationship but that they are now quite close.
- B. Mrs. D describes being a grandparent as 'having all the benefits of having children without the headaches and responsibilities.'
- C. Mr. and Mrs. N had a tumultuous relationship for decades but now appear more at ease with one another.
- D. Mr. A states that his ideal living situation would be himself and his adult son and daughter all under the same roof.
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D. While marital reconciliation, rekindled relationships with siblings, and satisfaction in the role of grandparent are common phenomena among older adults, it is less common for parents and children to see cohabitation as an ideal situation or first preference. Choices A, B, and C reflect common positive family dynamics experienced by older adults, such as improved relationships with siblings, contentment in the grandparent role, and easing of marital tensions over time. On the other hand, choice D stands out as atypical as it suggests an unconventional living arrangement where adult children live with their parent, which is less commonly preferred by older adults.