"I would like to go with you; however, I won't have time." In this sentence, what part of speech is the word "however"?
- A. Preposition
- B. Conjunction
- C. Conjunctive adverb
- D. Subordinating conjunction
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The word "however" in the given sentence functions as a conjunctive adverb. Conjunctive adverbs are used to connect clauses or sentences and show relationships between them. In this case, "however" introduces a contrast between the speaker's desire to go and the lack of time, indicating a shift in the information provided.
You may also like to solve these questions
Which of the following best explains the purpose of the parentheses in the sentence?
- A. to indicate the page numbers in the book where this information might be found
- B. to tell the reader when the Austro-Hungarian Empire collapsed
- C. to identify information that was located using another source
- D. to set off useful information that does not fit directly into the flow of the sentence
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The purpose of the parentheses in the sentence is to set off useful information that does not fit directly into the flow of the sentence. Parentheses are commonly used to provide additional details, explanations, or examples that are helpful but not essential to the main point of the sentence. In this case, the information about the Austro-Hungarian Empire is presented in parentheses to offer context but is not crucial to the main idea being communicated. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect as they do not accurately describe the function of parentheses in this context.
Based on the sentence contexts, which is true about the word bark?
- A. It is impossible to tell its meaning because its spelling and pronunciation are the same in both.
- B. The references to the dog in the first sentence and to the tree in the second define its meaning.
- C. "Bark" refers to a sound in the second sentence, and it refers to a plant covering in the first sentence.
- D. The meaning of this word is different in each sentence, but in one of them it is spelled wrong.
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The word "bark" is used in two different contexts in the sentences provided. In the first sentence, "bark" refers to the covering of a tree, while in the second sentence, it refers to a sound made by a dog. Therefore, option C correctly states that "bark" has different meanings in each sentence - plant covering in the first sentence and a sound in the second. Option A is incorrect because the meanings are clear from the context. Option B is incorrect as the meaning is not defined by the references to the dog or the tree but by the context of the sentences. Option D is incorrect because there is no misspelling of the word in either sentence.
Choose the sentence with the correct pronoun usage.
- A. "This mystery concerns my friend Watson and me."
- B. "This mystery concerns me and my friend Watson."
- C. "This mystery concerns my friend Watson and I."
- D. "This mystery concerns I and my friend Watson."
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct pronoun usage is 'me' when it is the object of a verb or preposition. In this sentence, 'me' is the object of the verb 'concerns,' so it should be used instead of 'I.' Additionally, the correct order for objects in a sentence is 'my friend Watson and me.' Choice B is incorrect because 'me' should come before 'my friend Watson' to maintain the correct order. Choice C is incorrect as 'I' is incorrectly used instead of 'me.' Choice D is incorrect because 'I' is used incorrectly as the object pronoun, and the order is reversed.
The teacher shared several apothegms with the class, hoping that the short, wise sayings would inspire thoughtful discussions.
- A. instructions
- B. questions
- C. sayings
- D. lectures
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: In this context, apothegms refers to short, wise sayings meant to convey wisdom or provoke thought. Apothegms are concise and insightful, serving as nuggets of wisdom. The term 'instructions' implies a set of directions or guidelines, not reflective of the nature of apothegms. 'Questions' are queries seeking information or answers, not synonymous with wise sayings. 'Lectures' are formal presentations or speeches, which are more extensive and detailed compared to the concise nature of apothegms.
Which of the following choices would be the best beginning for an essay titled "Scientists Debate: Global Climate Change"?
- A. The Earth is heating up. The polar ice caps are melting, and whole species are going extinct while governments and scientists argue over rules and regulations.
- B. The argument seems to be about whether climate change is really happening and if so, who causes it. Some scientists argue that people are causing the change.
- C. If the Earth heats up, what will our new world look like? Scientists who have dedicated their lives to understanding climate change have projected a series of scenarios that could happen.
- D. While few people can understand all of the issues related to climate change, one thing is sure: scientists do not agree. There seem to be several different views on how to look at climate change data.
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: Choice C would be the best beginning for an essay on 'Scientists Debate: Global Climate Change' because it sets the stage for discussion by introducing the potential consequences of Earth heating up and inviting readers to consider the implications. It also highlights the expertise of scientists who have dedicated their lives to understanding climate change, positioning them as credible sources for further discussion on the topic. The other choices either focus on the existing debate without providing a broader context (A and D) or present a narrow view on whether climate change is real and human-caused (B) without delving into the broader implications and discussions within the scientific community.