Nokea
In a scientific investigation, what is the first step?
- A. Analysis of results
- B. Drawing conclusions
- C. Formation of hypothesis
- D. Performing the experiment
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C: Formation of hypothesis. In a scientific investigation, forming a hypothesis is the initial step. A hypothesis is an educated guess or prediction based on existing knowledge and observations. It helps guide the experiment and provides a direction for the research process. Without a hypothesis, there is no specific aim or goal for the experiment. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because they occur after the formation of a hypothesis. Analysis of results and drawing conclusions typically come after the experiment has been conducted, while performing the experiment is done to test the hypothesis formed at the beginning of the investigation.
You may also like to solve these questions
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
- A. An organelle is a specialized structure in a cell, such as a ribosome.
- B. An organ is made up of different types of tissues that work together to perform specific functions.
- C. Organ systems are two or more organs performing similar functions.
- D. A tissue contains a variety of cells that work together to perform a specific function.
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The statement provided in Option B is FALSE. Organs are actually made up of different types of tissues that work together to perform specific functions, rather than being composed of similar tissues. Organs consist of various tissues, each with their own specialized functions that collectively contribute to the overall function of the organ. Options A, C, and D are true statements. Option A correctly defines an organelle as a specialized structure in a cell, like a ribosome. Option C accurately describes organ systems as multiple organs working together to perform related functions. Option D correctly explains that a tissue is composed of different cells working together to carry out a specific function.
What is essential for an experiment to be considered successful?
- A. a reasonable hypothesis
- B. a well-written lab report
- C. data that others can reproduce
- D. computer-aided statistical analysis
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: For an experiment to be considered successful, it is essential that the data collected and results obtained can be reproduced or replicated by others. This reproducibility ensures the reliability and validity of the experiment's findings. It allows for independent verification of the results and contributes to the overall scientific rigor of the study. While having a reasonable hypothesis, a well-written lab report, and computer-aided statistical analysis are important aspects of an experiment, the ability to reproduce the data is crucial for establishing the experiment's credibility and success. Without reproducibility, the findings may not be reliable, and the experiment's outcomes cannot be verified independently, leading to doubts about its validity.
Which of these body parts does not contain melanin?
- A. Hair
- B. Nails
- C. Skin
- D. Iris
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The iris is the colored part of the eye that determines the eye's color. Melanin is not present in the iris, unlike hair, nails, and skin. Melanin gives color to hair, nails, and skin, but not to the iris. Therefore, the correct answer is the iris (Choice D). Choices A, B, and C contain melanin and are incorrect.
Which of the following items is NOT a primary function of a healthy immune system?
- A. The immune system helps the body avoid infections.
- B. The immune system detects infections.
- C. The immune system eliminates infections.
- D. The immune system creates infections.
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D. The primary functions of a healthy immune system do not involve creating infections. A healthy immune system helps the body avoid infections by providing defense mechanisms, detects infections by recognizing harmful pathogens, and eliminates infections by attacking and clearing out pathogens. Creating infections goes against the protective role of the immune system and is not a function it performs. Therefore, choices A, B, and C are correct functions of a healthy immune system, while choice D is incorrect.
Based on the results that were stated, what would be a logical reason for some of the plants dying with the salt solution?
- A. Salt caused the plants to begin to dry up, leading to their death.
- B. The salt did not affect the plants.
- C. The salt provided adequate nutrients for growth.
- D. None of the above
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The most logical reason for some of the plants dying with the salt solution could be that salt caused the plants to begin to dry up, leading to their death. Excessive salt can disrupt the osmotic balance within plants, causing dehydration and ultimately death. Salt can create a hypertonic environment, drawing water out of plant cells and causing wilting and damage. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the presence of salt could have dried out some of the plants and caused them to die. Choices B and C are incorrect as the scenario presented indicates that the salt had a negative impact on the plants, causing some to die. Choice D is also incorrect as there is a valid reason provided for the plants dying due to the salt solution.