It can be inferred from the advertisement that
- A. A person staffing this position may work independently and/or as part of a team.
- B. Veronica Davis will make the hiring decisions.
- C. Caseloads will start out small for new hires.
- D. A candidate could work part-time if he or she chooses to.
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: It can be inferred from the advertisement that a person staffing this position may work independently and/or as part of a team. The job description mentions the requirement for the ability to work both self-directed and as part of a team, indicating flexibility in working styles. Choice B is incorrect as Veronica Smith is mentioned as the contact for application submission, not the hiring decision-maker. Choice C is incorrect as there is no mention of caseload sizes for new hires. Choice D is incorrect as the advertisement does not specify part-time work as an option.
You may also like to solve these questions
What does the 'nature of the fairy tale genre' refer to in Passage 2?
- A. The representation of basic human experience
- B. Good characters being pure good and bad characters being pure evil
- C. Different cultures coming up with similar versions of the same story
- D. Commoners becoming royalty
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The 'nature of the fairy tale genre' in Passage 2 refers to the representation of basic human experiences. The passage emphasizes that fairy tales embody fundamental human desires and fears, portraying characters as either pure good or pure evil and celebrating themes like romance and transformation. This representation of basic human experiences makes fairy tales relatable and universal, resonating with audiences across various cultures and time periods. Choices B, C, and D are incorrect because while they may be elements found in fairy tales, they do not capture the essence of the 'nature of the fairy tale genre' as being rooted in the representation of fundamental human experiences.
In a lesson on mass media, a teacher is showing commercials and analyzing their hidden messages. Which of the following is an example of a commercial that claims professional authority not supported by evidence?
- A. A commercial selling pain relief featuring a professional basketball player who says he uses the product
- B. A commercial for cold medicine narrated by a man in a doctor's coat
- C. A commercial for a new toy showing footage of children playing happily with it
- D. A commercial for a prepared food with testimonials by real consumers
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The commercial for cold medicine narrated by a man in a doctor's coat is the correct answer. This commercial claims professional authority without providing any evidence of the narrator's credentials. While the man may appear to be a doctor with his coat, there is no proof that he is actually a medical professional or that the product is recommended by experts. This lack of evidence can mislead consumers by giving the product an air of legitimacy and credibility without factual support. Choices A, C, and D do not fit the criteria as they involve a professional athlete endorsing a product, children enjoying a toy, and real consumers providing testimonials respectively.
Which of the above options is most likely the best choice for Regina, considering her dairy allergy?
- A. Cream of potato soup
- B. Lentil soup
- C. Broccoli cheese soup
- D. Cream of tomato soup
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: Given Regina's severe allergy to dairy products, the best choice for her would be Lentil soup. This option does not contain any dairy and is a nutritious choice that provides a good balance of protein, fiber, and other essential nutrients. It is a hearty and filling option that can help keep Regina satisfied and energized. Additionally, lentils are known for their health benefits, including promoting heart health and digestion. Choices A, C, and D are less suitable for Regina as they contain dairy or are not as nutritious as lentil soup.
Which of the following statements offers a supporting argument for the passage's claim that many coastal islands are eroding?
- A. Recent hurricane seasons have been expensive.
- B. The Atlantic Basin is entering an active period.
- C. Louisiana has lost 2,000 square miles of coastal land.
- D. Barrier islands are the first line of defense against coastal storms.
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: Statement C directly provides evidence of coastal land erosion by stating that Louisiana has lost a significant amount of coastal land area. This supports the passage's claim that many coastal islands are eroding. Choice A is incorrect because the expense of recent hurricane seasons does not directly relate to coastal land erosion. Choice B is incorrect as the active period of the Atlantic Basin does not specifically address coastal land erosion. Choice D, while related to coastal storms, does not directly support the claim that many coastal islands are eroding.
Which of the following choices introduces a specific claim and distinguishes it from counterclaims?
- A. Is texting while driving really a critical safety issue? Are all kinds of distracted driving created equal? What can be said about the nature of distracted driving among teenagers?
- B. It's true that distracted driving is dangerous. There may be nothing more dangerous than texting while driving. Texting while driving has resulted in more than 15,000 deaths and over 200,000 injuries. The majority of texting drivers are teens, although other age groups have been implicated.
- C. Texting while driving is one of the key issues facing young people today: it's a fact that texting drivers have killed over 16,000 people between 2002 and
- D. While some argue that texting while driving is just one form of distracted driving, it stands out as particularly hazardous due to the level of focus it diverts from the road. Studies show that drivers who text are 23 times more likely to be involved in an accident compared to other forms of distracted driving.
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: Choice B introduces a specific claim that texting while driving is extremely dangerous by stating that 'there may be nothing more dangerous than texting while driving' and supports this claim with statistics on the number of deaths and injuries caused by texting while driving. It further emphasizes the impact by mentioning that the majority of texting drivers are teens. This approach of providing specific evidence helps to distinguish the claim from counterclaims and strengthens the argument. Choices A, C, and D do not introduce a specific claim supported by factual evidence and fail to distinguish it from potential counterclaims, making them less effective in presenting a strong argument.