Nokea
John Smith was the man ____ photographed the landscape.
- A. Who
- B. Which
- C. Whom
- D. That
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: In this sentence, 'who' is the correct relative pronoun to refer to a person, John Smith. 'Who' is used for subjects, while 'whom' is used for objects. 'Which' is used for things or animals, and 'that' can refer to both people and things, but 'who' is the most appropriate choice here as it refers specifically to a person, John Smith, who is the one performing the action of photographing the landscape.
You may also like to solve these questions
Select the meaning of the word 'intransigent' in the sentence: 'Jolie has remained intransigent in her stance on the issue.'
- A. Stubborn
- B. Indefinite
- C. Passionate
- D. Outspoken
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A: 'Stubborn.' In this context, 'intransigent' means refusing to change one's views or to agree about something, which aligns with the meaning of 'stubborn.' Choice B, 'Indefinite,' is incorrect as it does not capture the essence of being unyielding or uncompromising. Choice C, 'Passionate,' is incorrect as it does not convey the idea of being unwilling to change one's stance. Choice D, 'Outspoken,' is also incorrect as it does not reflect the meaning of being inflexible or obstinate.
Which of the following best describes the peer review process?
- A. It guarantees acceptance of all papers
- B. It requires time and attention to complete
- C. It is a straightforward task
- D. It enables instant publication of papers
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B because the peer review process demands time and attention for a thorough evaluation by experts. Choice A is incorrect because peer review does not guarantee acceptance of all papers; rather, it aims to assess the quality and validity of research. Choice C is incorrect as peer review is not always a simple or straightforward task due to the detailed scrutiny involved. Choice D is incorrect because peer review does not allow papers to be published instantly; instead, it involves a rigorous evaluation process before publication.
Cassidy's track and field experience was greater than any in her school's history. Cassidy was quite tall at 5'10". This made hurdling easier, which is where she got her start. It was easy to spot Cassidy with her long ponytail.
- A. Cassidy's track and field experience was greater than any in her school's history.
- B. Cassidy was quite tall at 5'10".
- C. This made hurdling easier, which is where she got her start.
- D. It was easy to spot Cassidy with her long ponytail.
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The detail about Cassidy's ponytail is irrelevant to her track and field experience and can be removed. Choices A, B, and C provide relevant information about Cassidy's track and field experience and how her height contributed to her hurdling skills. However, choice D is the correct answer as it highlights an unrelated detail about her appearance, which does not impact her athletic abilities or achievements in track and field.
Which of the following examples is a correctly punctuated compound sentence?
- A. Condors are protected by laws, but many people fear they will soon become extinct.
- B. Asian elephants, cheetahs, and tigers are all in danger of extinction.
- C. Some efforts are being made to protect animals and more people are behind this initiative.
- D. Most hunters don't kill endangered species, but some don't care if it's unlawful.
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Option A presents a correctly punctuated compound sentence. It consists of two independent clauses 'Condors are protected by laws' and 'many people fear they will soon become extinct,' which are appropriately joined by a comma and the coordinating conjunction 'but.' In contrast, in option B, the sentence only lists items without independent clauses. Option C combines phrases without independent clauses, and Option D incorrectly uses a comma before the coordinating conjunction 'but' without an independent clause following it.
Which of the following sentences supports the thesis statement: 'Organic gardening can be as simple or complex as you choose to make it'?
- A. Organic gardening ranges from basic composting to a chemical analysis of the soil.
- B. Organic gardening is easy.
- C. Gardening is fun for everyone.
- D. Organic foods are better for health.
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Choice A is the correct answer because it directly supports the thesis statement by illustrating the wide spectrum of complexity within organic gardening, from basic practices like composting to more advanced techniques like soil chemical analysis. This range of possibilities aligns with the idea that organic gardening can be as simple or as complex as one chooses to make it. Choices B, C, and D do not directly relate to the flexibility and complexity aspect of organic gardening as emphasized in the thesis statement. Choice B oversimplifies the process, choice C focuses on the enjoyment of gardening in general rather than the complexity of organic gardening, and choice D discusses the health benefits of organic foods, which is not directly related to the range of options within organic gardening.