Nokea
Many classic experiments have given us indirect evidence of the nature of the atom. Which of the experiments listed below did not give the results described?
- A. The Rutherford experiment proved the Thomson "plum- pudding" model of the atom to be essentially correct.
- B. The Rutherford experiment was useful in determining the nuclear charge on the atom.
- C. Millikan's oil-drop experiment showed that the charge on any particle was a simple multiple of the charge on the electron.
- D. The electric discharge tube proved that electrons have a negative charge.
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A because the Rutherford experiment actually disproved the Thomson "plum-pudding" model of the atom. Rutherford's experiment involved firing alpha particles at a thin gold foil and observing their scattering patterns. The results showed that atoms have a small, dense, positively charged nucleus, which contradicted the Thomson model. Choice B is correct as the experiment was indeed useful in determining the nuclear charge on the atom. Choice C is incorrect because Millikan's oil-drop experiment determined the charge on the electron, not just that it was a simple multiple. Choice D is incorrect as the electric discharge tube did show that electrons have a negative charge.
You may also like to solve these questions
The melting point of a certain element is 391°C. What is this on the Fahrenheit scale?
- A. 490°F
- B. 249°F
- C. 977°F
- D. 736°F
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: To convert Celsius to Fahrenheit, use the formula: °F = (°C × 9/5) + 32. Plugging in 391°C, we get: °F = (391 × 9/5) + 32 = 706.2 + 32 = 738.2. Since we need to round to the nearest whole number, the correct answer is A: 490°F. Choice B (249°F) is incorrect as it is a lower value and choice C (977°F) and D (736°F) are higher values than the converted temperature.
The amount of uncertainty in a measured quantity is determined by:
- A. both the skill of the observer and the limitations of the measuring instrument
- B. neither the skill of the observer nor the limitations of the measuring instrument
- C. the limitations of the measuring instrument only
- D. the skill of the observer only
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A because the amount of uncertainty in a measured quantity is influenced by both the skill of the observer and the limitations of the measuring instrument. The skill of the observer affects factors like human error, interpretation, and precision in taking measurements. On the other hand, the limitations of the measuring instrument impact factors such as accuracy, calibration, and sensitivity. Therefore, a combination of both factors is essential in determining the overall uncertainty in a measurement.
Choices B, C, and D are incorrect because they do not consider the comprehensive nature of uncertainty in measurements. Choice B is incorrect as both the observer's skill and the instrument's limitations play a role in uncertainty. Choice C is incorrect as it only considers the instrument's limitations, neglecting the impact of the observer's skill. Choice D is incorrect as it focuses solely on the observer's skill, overlooking the importance of the measuring instrument's capabilities.
Avogadro's hypothesis states that:
- A. Each atom of oxygen is 16 times more massive than an atom of hydrogen.
- B. A given compound always contains exactly the same proportion of elements by mass.
- C. When two elements form a series of compounds, the ratios of masses that combine with 1 gram of the first element can always be reduced to small whole numbers.
- D. At the same temperature and pressure, equal volumes of different gases contain an equal number of particles.
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: Rationale for correct answer D: Avogadro's hypothesis states that equal volumes of different gases at the same temperature and pressure contain an equal number of particles. This is because gases behave similarly under these conditions due to the ideal gas law. Avogadro's hypothesis is crucial in understanding the behavior of gases and is fundamental in the study of chemistry.
Summary of incorrect choices:
A: This statement is about the relative mass of atoms of different elements, not Avogadro's hypothesis.
B: This statement relates to the law of definite proportions, not Avogadro's hypothesis.
C: This statement refers to the law of multiple proportions, not Avogadro's hypothesis.
The numbers of protons, neutrons, and electrons in K+ are: A) 20 p, 19 n, 19 e
- A. 20 p, 19 n, 20 e
- B. 19 p, 20 n, 20 e
- C. 19 p, 20 n, 19 e
- D. 19 p, 20 n, 18 e
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C: 19 p, 20 n, 19 e. K+ has an atomic number of 19, indicating 19 protons. Since it is a potassium ion with a +1 charge, it lost one electron, giving it 19 electrons instead of the usual 20. The number of neutrons is found by subtracting the atomic number from the mass number (39 for potassium) to get 20 neutrons. Option A is incorrect due to the incorrect number of electrons. Option B has the incorrect number of protons. Option D has the incorrect number of electrons.
In March 2008, gold reached a milestone value of $1000 per troy ounce. At that price, what was the cost of a gram of gold? (1 troy ounce = 10 g)
- A. less than $1
- B. between $1 and $10
- C. between $10 and $50
- D. between $50 and $100
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: To find the cost of a gram of gold at $1000 per troy ounce, we divide $1000 by 10 (since 1 troy ounce = 10g). This gives us $100 per gram. Therefore, the correct answer is C: between $10 and $50. Option A is incorrect as it is less than $1, option B is incorrect as it is between $1 and $10, and option D is incorrect as it is between $50 and $100.