Nokea
Mr. K has dementia. Having a good deal of money, he has a private room at Haven Nursing Home. He is a retired industrialist whose children and current wife are already squabbling bitterly over his estate. During visits, they often get into shouting matches that disturb the other residents and Mr. K himself. How should an administrator handle this family?
- A. Emphasize that they must behave civilly when visiting
- B. Have them set up separate visiting schedules
- C. Ask them to stay away
- D. Close Mr. K's door when they visit
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: There is little an administrator can do about this dysfunctional family's behavior, but Mr. K should not be upset by it, and the other residents deserve to be protected from shouting. By setting up separate visiting schedules, the family can continue to provide needed support for their husband and father. If they accidentally visit at the same time, the door can be kept closed until they leave.
You may also like to solve these questions
For which of the following is informed consent required?
- A. Ordering a liquid diet for a post-surgical patient
- B. Listening to a patient reveal his or her private, personal secrets
- C. Giving a patient saline solution to relieve dry nasal passages
- D. Asking a patient to complete a questionnaire for a research study on hospital practices
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: Informed consent is required when asking a patient to participate in a research study, as mentioned in choice D. Choices A, B, and C involve routine care measures that do not require specific informed consent. Ordering a liquid diet, providing saline solution for dry nasal passages, or listening to a patient's personal secrets are part of standard care and do not typically necessitate formal consent beyond general consent for treatment.
Nurse B arrives for his regular night shift at a care facility for the aged. Due to a family emergency, he has only slept for 3 hours since his last shift. One of Nurse B's aides calls in sick, and there is no one available to replace the aide that night. With no help accessible, Nurse B lifts an obese patient from a wheelchair into a bed alone. Short on time and assistance, Nurse B decides to forgo the patient's evening bath. Legally, what does Nurse B most likely face?
- A. Little risk of liability because he is doing his best under difficult circumstances
- B. Immediate termination for dereliction of duty
- C. Liability if a pattern of negligence is identified in his performance evaluation
- D. A high risk of liability for his actions
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: In this scenario, Nurse B faces a high risk of liability for his actions due to several factors. Working with insufficient resources, failing to adhere to policies and procedures, taking shortcuts, and working while highly stressed are all situations that increase the risk of liability. Nurse B's decision to lift an obese patient without assistance and skip the patient's evening bath due to time constraints and lack of help are clear examples of actions that can lead to legal consequences. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because the circumstances described in the scenario indicate a higher likelihood of liability due to the factors mentioned above.
Which of the following is required in order for a healthcare provider to be legally justified in not attempting to save a client's life?
- A. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' (DNR) statement on the patient's care plan
- B. A 'No-Code' sign or symbol placed at the patient's bedside
- C. A 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet
- D. The next of kin's request for 'Do Not Resuscitate' orally or in writing
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: To legally justify not attempting to save a client's life, a healthcare provider must have a 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet. Unless there is a specific order stating that resuscitation should not be performed, failure to do so can be considered negligence. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' statement on the care plan or a symbol at the bedside is not legally valid without the proper medical order. Additionally, a request from the next of kin, whether oral or written, is not a substitute for a signed physician's order.
As a daughter and mother are extremely close emotionally, they made a pact years ago never to put the mother in a nursing home. Now, the physical demands of caregiving are becoming too great. What is the best way a nurse can help the daughter?
- A. Persuade her to admit her mother to a nursing home
- B. Aid her in finding help with in-home care
- C. Praise her success in being a good daughter and keeping her promise
- D. Point out her mistaken altruism
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: In this situation, the best course of action for the nurse is to aid the daughter in finding help with in-home care. Persuading her to admit her mother to a nursing home would likely cause guilt and emotional distress due to their pact. Praise alone may not address the current physical caregiving challenges. Pointing out her 'mistaken altruism' could be seen as insensitive and unhelpful. Providing practical assistance in finding in-home care can alleviate the physical demands on the daughter while still honoring the emotional commitment they made.
A nurse has been providing care for a 69-year-old female client who has recently had her right foot amputated as a result of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer. The nurse undertook to perform debridement of the wound despite her lack of relevant education and experience. The client experienced permanent nerve damage as a result of the nurse's misguided efforts. Which category of legal liability is most likely relevant in this case?
- A. Larceny
- B. Assault
- C. Invasion of privacy
- D. Negligence
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: In this case, the most likely relevant category of legal liability is negligence. Negligence involves the commission of an improper act, as exemplified by the nurse's actions of performing a procedure without the necessary education and experience, leading to permanent nerve damage for the client. Larceny refers to theft, assault involves a deliberate threat to harm, and invasion of privacy pertains to the violation of a person's right to privacy. Therefore, in this scenario, the nurse's actions align more closely with negligence.