Nokea
The new mother wanted to use cloth diapers rather than disposables.
- A. Close
- B. Clothing
- C. Cloth
- D. Clothes
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The correct choice is C. Cloth because in the sentence, the new mother expressed a preference for using cloth diapers over disposables. 'Cloth' refers to a type of diaper material, and it makes sense in the context of the sentence. Choice A, 'Close,' is incorrect as it does not relate to the type of diapers being discussed. Choice B, 'Clothing,' is incorrect as it refers to garments worn on the body, not diapers. Choice D, 'Clothes,' is also incorrect as it is used for general garments, not specific to diapers.
You may also like to solve these questions
What does inhibiting mean?
- A. Blocking
- B. Hindering
- C. Energizing
- D. Slowing down improvement
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B: 'Hindering.' Inhibiting means to hinder or slow down a process rather than actively block or energize it. Hindering implies causing a delay or obstruction, which aligns closely with the meaning of inhibiting. Choices A and C are incorrect because inhibiting does not necessarily mean completely blocking or energizing a process. Choice D is incorrect as it specifically mentions improvement, which is not always the focus of inhibiting.
What does 'lethargic' mean?
- A. Active
- B. Difficult to arouse
- C. Energized
- D. Wide awake
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: Lethargic refers to a state of sluggishness or drowsiness, making it difficult for a person to become alert or aroused. This term is the opposite of being active, energized, or wide awake. Choice A is incorrect as 'lethargic' is the opposite of 'active.' Choice C is incorrect as 'lethargic' implies a lack of energy. Choice D is incorrect as 'lethargic' signifies drowsiness, the opposite of being 'wide awake.' The correct answer is B.
He ate four pieces of fried chicken at dinner, and _____ vegetables.
- A. no
- B. some
- C. little
- D. few
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is 'no' as it implies the absence of vegetables, indicating that he did not consume any vegetables along with the fried chicken. 'Some' (choice B) implies an unspecified quantity of vegetables were eaten, 'little' (choice C) implies a small amount of vegetables, and 'few' (choice D) is used for countable items, not for uncountable items like vegetables.
What does 'Occluded' mean?
- A. Open
- B. Closed or obstructed
- C. Partially obstructed
- D. Expanded
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The term 'Occluded' means something is closed or obstructed, not open as in choice A. It is more than just partially obstructed as in choice C. It does not mean expanded as in choice D. Therefore, the correct answer is B, 'Closed or obstructed.'
The accident _____ if the motorist had obeyed the speed limit sign.
- A. could have happened
- B. never would have happened
- C. wouldn't have occurred
- D. could happen
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is 'never would have happened.' This choice correctly expresses the hypothetical outcome that did not occur due to the motorist obeying the speed limit sign. The phrase 'never would have happened' is the most suitable option in this context as it indicates a past event that was prevented by following a certain condition. Choice A ('could have happened') is incorrect as it does not convey the same level of certainty and definiteness as 'never would have happened.' Choice C ('wouldn't have occurred') is close but lacks the emphasis on the event not taking place at all. Choice D ('could happen') is in the present tense and does not fit the context of a past hypothetical situation.