His charismatic personality, organizational abilities, sheer determination, and rhetorical skills enabled him to quickly rise through the chapter's ranks. Which of the following revisions maintains the correct tense?
- A. NO CHANGE
- B. are enabling him to quickly rise
- C. enabled him to quickly rise
- D. will enable him to quickly rise
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: Choice C, 'enabled him to quickly rise,' is the correct answer as it maintains the past tense to match the context of the sentence. The sentence describes actions that have already occurred, so the past tense 'enabled' is appropriate. Choice A is incorrect as it does not provide the correct tense for the sentence. Choice B is incorrect as it uses the present continuous tense, which is not suitable for the context of the sentence. Choice D is incorrect as it uses the future tense, which does not align with the past actions described in the sentence.
You may also like to solve these questions
Which word choices will correctly complete the sentence? Increasing the price of bus fares has had a greater effect on ridership than expected.
- A. affect; then
- B. affect; than
- C. effect; then
- D. effect; than
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: In this sentence, 'effect' is the correct word as it refers to the result of increasing bus fares. Additionally, 'than' is used for making comparisons, which is appropriate in this context. 'Affect' is incorrect as it is a verb, not a noun, and 'then' is incorrect as it should be 'than' to show the comparison between the actual outcome and the expected outcome.
What is the part of speech of the word 'exhaustive' in the sentence: 'Investigators conducted an exhaustive inquiry into the accusations of corruption'?
- A. Noun
- B. Verb
- C. Adverb
- D. Adjective
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The word 'exhaustive' is an adjective in this sentence. Adjectives modify nouns, and in this case, 'exhaustive' is describing the noun 'inquiry.' A noun, verb, or adverb would not be appropriate here. A noun is a person, place, thing, or idea, which 'exhaustive' is not. A verb is an action word, and 'exhaustive' is not functioning as a verb in this sentence. An adverb typically modifies a verb, adjective, or another adverb, but 'exhaustive' is not serving this function in the sentence provided. Therefore, the correct answer is 'D: Adjective.'
Which of the following is an appropriately-punctuated correction for this sentence: Protestors filled the streets of the city because they were dissatisfied with the government's leadership?
- A. Protestors filled the streets of the city, because they were dissatisfied with the government's leadership.
- B. Protesters, filled the streets of the city, because they were dissatisfied with the government's leadership.
- C. Because they were dissatisfied with the government's leadership protestors filled the streets of the city.
- D. Protestors filled the streets of the city because they were dissatisfied with the government's leadership.
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D. The sentence should be corrected by removing the period and joining the clauses to avoid a sentence fragment. Choice A is incorrect due to the unnecessary comma after 'city.' Choice B is incorrect as it mistakenly separates the subject and verb with a comma. Choice C is incorrect as it begins with the subordinate clause, disrupting the logical flow of the sentence.
What kind of error is present in the following sentence? This summer, I'm planning to travel to Italy, take a Mediterranean cruise, go to Pompeii, and eat a lot of Italian food.
- A. Parallelism
- B. Sentence fragment
- C. Misplaced modifier
- D. Subject-verb agreement
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A, parallelism. The sentence contains a parallelism error because the verbs in the list are not in the same grammatical form. In a parallel structure, all items in a list should be formatted consistently. In this case, 'take a Mediterranean cruise' and 'going to Pompeii' are not parallel. 'Go to Pompeii' should be corrected to 'visit Pompeii' to maintain parallelism. Choices B, C, and D are incorrect because the sentence is a complete sentence, does not have any misplaced modifiers, and does not involve subject-verb agreement errors.
What kind of error does the following sentence contain? Some workers use all their sick leave, other workers cash out their leave.
- A. Parallelism
- B. Comma splice
- C. Sentence fragment
- D. Subject-verb agreement
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B: Comma splice. A comma splice is present in the sentence, where two independent clauses are incorrectly joined by a comma. In this case, 'Some workers use all their sick leave' and 'other workers cash out their leave' are two independent clauses that should be separated by a conjunction or a stronger punctuation mark like a semicolon or period. Choice A, parallelism, is incorrect because the error in the sentence is not related to maintaining parallel structure. Choice C, sentence fragment, is incorrect as the sentence contains two independent clauses, not fragments. Choice D, subject-verb agreement, is also incorrect as the error in the sentence does not involve agreement between subjects and verbs.
Nokea