If the word antibacterial describes a substance that kills bacteria, you can infer that the prefix anti-means:
- A. Original to
- B. Against
- C. Before
- D. Under
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is 'B: Against.' The prefix 'anti-' means 'against,' as seen in the word 'antibacterial,' which denotes something that acts against bacteria. Choice A, 'Original to,' is incorrect as the prefix 'anti-' does not imply 'original to.' Choice C, 'Before,' is incorrect as 'anti-' does not signify 'before' but rather 'against.' Choice D, 'Under,' is also incorrect as 'anti-' does not convey the idea of being 'under' but rather 'against' in this context.
You may also like to solve these questions
The RV was a great purchase for our family and brought us all closer together. Which of the following transitional phrases would improve this sentence?
- A. NO CHANGE
- B. Not surprisingly, the RV
- C. Furthermore, the RV
- D. As it turns out, the RV
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The transitional phrase 'As it turns out' adds a reflective tone that matches the surprise at how well the RV worked for the family. Choice A ('NO CHANGE') does not introduce any new information or transition. Choice B ('Not surprisingly, the RV') contradicts the surprise factor mentioned in the sentence. Choice C ('Furthermore, the RV') does not provide a suitable transition given the context of the sentence.
Fred Hampton desired to see lasting social change for African American people through nonviolent means and community recognition. Which of the following is the best way to start this sentence?
- A. NO CHANGE
- B. Unfortunately,
- C. Finally,
- D. As a result,
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: 'As a result' correctly introduces the cause-and-effect relationship in the sentence. In this context, 'As a result' signifies that Fred Hampton's desire for lasting social change through nonviolent means and community recognition led to a specific outcome or consequence. The other choices, 'Unfortunately,' 'Finally,' and 'NO CHANGE,' do not fit the context as they do not convey the cause-and-effect relationship intended in the sentence.
Which of the following is the most likely setting of the scenario below? Walking along the Thames, Julianna saw a sign advertising a fish and chips shop. Since she felt a bit peckish, she made her way over to the queue.
- A. Chicago, United States
- B. Vienna, Austria
- C. Tokyo, Japan
- D. London, England
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The mention of the Thames, fish and chips, and queue strongly indicates a British setting. Fish and chips are a traditional British dish, and the Thames is a famous river in London, England. Additionally, forming a queue is a common practice in England. Therefore, based on these cultural clues, London, England, is the most likely setting of the scenario. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect as they do not align with the specific cultural references mentioned in the scenario.
Which of the following choices best combines the following sentences? The French and Indian War was not an isolated war in North America. It was part of a larger war that Europe was fighting. Europeans called it the Seven Years' War.
- A. The French and Indian War did not occur in North America but was rather a small part of the larger European war known as the Seven Years' War.
- B. What Europeans called the Seven Years' War was called the French and Indian War in North America. It was part of a larger war that Europe was fighting.
- C. The French and Indian War was not an isolated war in North America but was rather part of a larger war that Europe was fighting, known among Europeans as the Seven Years' War.
- D. While North America was fighting the French and Indian War, the Europeans were fighting a much larger war known as the Seven Years' War.
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: Choice C best combines the sentences by correctly stating that the French and Indian War was not an isolated conflict in North America but rather part of a larger war that Europe was engaged in, known as the Seven Years' War. This option maintains the chronological order of events and provides a clear and concise explanation. Choices A, B, and D either incorrectly convey the relationship between the wars, introduce unnecessary information, or deviate from the original context of the sentences, making them less suitable for combining the information effectively.
Joann has brainstormed, created an outline, and completed research for a major term paper. Which of the following is the next step she should complete in the writing process?
- A. Editing
- B. Publishing
- C. Proofreading
- D. Drafting
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: After completing research and outlining, the next logical step in the writing process is drafting. Drafting involves putting together the first version of the paper based on the outline and research. This step focuses on organizing thoughts, expanding ideas, and structuring the content. Editing (choice A) occurs after drafting and involves revising and refining the content for clarity, coherence, and correctness. Publishing (choice B) is the final step where the finished work is made available to the audience. Proofreading (choice C) typically follows editing and focuses on correcting spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.