Nokea
Mr Yee, 45 years old, reports three recent gout attacks in the ankle or knee. You notice a small tophus over his left elbow. He says that two years ago he took allopurinol 100 mg for one month followed by 200 mg OM for one month, but stopped as it 'did not help his gout and there was no improvement'. When you probe, he states that he was not very adherent to allopurinol either then as it was some years ago. He says he took it likely 'once or twice a week'. He states that he did not experience any rashes or other side effects to it then. He did not go back to see his previous GP as he has moved house and your clinic is nearer to his home. He does not drink alcohol except one glass of wine once or twice a year on special occasions. Two weeks ago, he was admitted to the hospital for a gout flare. He had blood tests done, which returned the results below. He is asking you to give him Arcoxia standby as it usually works for his gout flare. Uric acid 620 mmol/L, Creatinine 96 umol/L, eGFR >90 mL/min, BP 144/94 mmHg. He has HTN on HCTZ long-term. Which is incorrect advice?
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: Tophus and 620 uric acid yell chronic gout allopurinol's not bunk; past spotty use tanked it, not the drug. Restarting with titration, colchicine cover, and allergy watch fits; HLA testing flags risk. Swapping to febuxostat or probenecid skips allopurinol's shot wrong call when adherence, not efficacy, flopped. Clinicians correct this, steering chronic control right.