Nokea
The speaker addresses his audience as 'My Good Friends.' What kind of credibility does this salutation give to the speaker?
- A. The speaker is an employer addressing his employees, so the salutation is a way to bridge the gap between himself and his employees.
- B. The speaker's salutation is one from an entertainer to his audience, using friendly language to connect before a serious speech.
- C. The salutation gives the serious speech that follows a somber tone, as it is used ironically.
- D. The speech is one from a politician to the public, so the salutation is used to grab the audience's attention.
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The speaker's address of 'My Good Friends' implies a sense of warmth and familiarity, indicating that the speaker wants to establish a connection with the audience before delivering a serious speech. This type of salutation is often used by entertainers to engage the audience and create a friendly atmosphere conducive to effective communication. Choice A is incorrect because there is no indication of an employer-employee relationship. Choice C is incorrect as there is no indication of irony in the salutation. Choice D is incorrect as the salutation aims to create a connection rather than grab attention as a politician might.
You may also like to solve these questions
What would a mongoose likely eat according to the food chain diagram?
- A. Shrub
- B. Aardvark
- C. Vulture
- D. Mouse
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: According to the food chain diagram, mongooses are consumers that feed on smaller animals like mice, making choice D the correct answer. Shrub (choice A) is a plant and not a typical food for mongooses. Aardvark (choice B) is a large mammal that is not a primary food source for mongooses. Vulture (choice C) is a scavenger bird that typically feeds on carrion, not a preferred food for mongooses.
How does the author generally present the information in the extract?
- A. Chronological order
- B. Comparison-contrast
- C. Cause-effect
- D. Conclusion-premises
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The author generally presents the information in a cause-effect format. The scientist talks about the increase in carbon dioxide emissions by countries like China, India, and Brazil leading to rising global temperatures. The politician, on the other hand, argues against a causal link between carbon emissions and temperature increase, suggesting a natural rise in temperatures. The information is structured around the cause of carbon emissions and its effect on global temperatures. Choice A, chronological order, is incorrect as the information is not presented in a time sequence but rather based on cause and effect. Choice B, comparison-contrast, is not the best description as the focus is more on cause and effect rather than comparing or contrasting different elements. Choice D, conclusion-premises, is also incorrect as the information does not follow the pattern of drawing conclusions based on premises but rather discusses the relationship between carbon emissions and temperature increase.
What is the best summary of the instructor's motive in sending the email to the students?
- A. Expressing concern about students' grades and emphasizing the importance of being worried.
- B. Recognizing the low exam scores and the need to adjust the grading plan to help students improve.
- C. Explaining the purpose of a group project and how it benefits students working together.
- D. Stating the strict grading policy set at the beginning of the semester.
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: Answer choice B is the correct summary of the instructor's motive in sending the email to the students. The passage mentions that the instructor acknowledged the low exam scores, including a high failure rate and the need to reconsider the grading plan for the semester. This indicates that the instructor wants to adjust the grading plan to provide students with an opportunity to improve their scores. Choice A is incorrect as it focuses on expressing concern rather than on adjusting the grading plan. Choice C is unrelated as it discusses the purpose of a group project. Choice D is also incorrect as it mentions the strict grading policy set at the beginning of the semester, which is not the main focus of the email sent by the instructor.
Which of the following most accurately describes how the argument proceeds?
- A. The argument proceeds by stating a conclusion, then providing supporting evidence.
- B. The argument proceeds by stating several facts and drawing a conclusion.
- C. The argument proceeds by offering a premise, then refuting it.
- D. The argument proceeds by making a comparison between two subjects.
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A. The argument in the text proceeds by stating a conclusion ('Dwight is the best employee') and then providing supporting evidence ('The top salesman is always the best employee'). This aligns with choice A, where the argument is structured by stating a conclusion first and then offering supporting evidence. Choices B, C, and D are incorrect because the argument in the text does not simply present facts and draw a conclusion, offer a premise and then refute it, or make a comparison between two subjects.
Which of the following would be a useful source of information to determine the validity of the argument presented in the passage?
- A. A survey of high school students' preferences regarding foreign language requirements.
- B. A comparison of the correlation between a second language introduced at home and subsequent college acceptance rates.
- C. A survey asking parents to select the foreign language they would like their children to study in high school.
- D. A comparison of the correlation between high school students' study of a foreign language and subsequent college acceptance rates.
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The passage emphasizes the importance of studying a foreign language in high school for future success, including college acceptance rates and job market demand. To evaluate the argument's validity, it is crucial to examine the direct impact of studying a foreign language on college acceptance rates. Choice D is the correct answer because it directly addresses this aspect by comparing the correlation between high school students' study of a foreign language and subsequent college acceptance rates. This comparison would provide concrete evidence supporting or refuting the argument presented in the passage. Choices A, B, and C, though related to language education, do not directly assess the specific relationship between studying a foreign language in high school and college acceptance rates, making them less relevant for evaluating the argument's validity.