Nokea
An adult skeleton had 206 bones. The skeleton has two major divisions: the axil skeleton and the appendicular skeleton. The axial skeleton, which consists of 80 bones including the skull, vertebrae, and rib, is located down the center of the body. The axial skeleton protects vital organs such as the brain and heart. The appendicular skeleton consists of 126 ones of the arms, legs, and the bones that attach these bones to the axial skeleton. The appendicular skeleton includes the scapulae (shoulder blades), clavicles (collarbones), and pelvic (hip) bones.
Which of the following bones is not part of the appendicular skeleton?
- A. skull
- B. clavicle
- C. scapula
- D. pelvic bone
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A, 'skull.' The skull is part of the axial skeleton, not the appendicular skeleton. The axial skeleton, which includes the skull, vertebrae, and ribs, is located down the center of the body and protects vital organs such as the brain and heart. On the other hand, the appendicular skeleton consists of bones of the arms, legs, and the bones that attach these limbs to the axial skeleton. Choices B, C, and D (clavicle, scapula, pelvic bone) are part of the appendicular skeleton as they form the bones of the limbs and girdles that connect the limbs to the axial skeleton.
You may also like to solve these questions
A famous children's author recently published a historical fiction novel under
a pseudonym; however, it did not sell as many copies as her children's books.
In her earlier years, she had majored in history and earned a graduate degree
in Antebellum American History, which is the time frame of her new novel.
Critics praised this newest work far more than the children's series that made
her famous. In fact, her new novel was nominated for the prestigious Albert J.
Beveridge Award, but still isn't selling like her children's books, which fly off
the shelves because of her name alone.
Which one of the following statements might be accurately inferred based on the above passage?
- A. The famous children's author produced a lesser-quality book under her pseudonym.
- B. The famous children's author has expertise in Antebellum America.
- C. The famous children's author did not receive adequate publicity for her historical novel.
- D. Historical fiction novels are more popular than children's series.
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C. The passage mentions that the author published a historical fiction novel under a pseudonym, which received critical acclaim but did not sell as well as her children's books. This indicates that the author did not receive adequate publicity for her historical novel, as it did not reach the same level of popularity as her children's books. Choices A and B are incorrect as there is no mention of the quality of the book produced under the pseudonym or the author's expertise in Antebellum America. Choice D is also incorrect as the passage does not compare the overall popularity of historical fiction novels to children's series.
Car Owner's Manual: Table of Contents: Chapter I: Vehicle Instruments Chapter II: Safety Options Chapter III: Audio, Climate, and Voice Controls Chapter IV: Pre-Driving and Driving Chapter V: Routine Maintenance Chapter VI: Emergencies Chapter VII: Consumer Resources
To which chapter should Regina turn if she needs to find out what to do if the car begins overheating?
- A. III
- B. IV
- C. VI
- D. I
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: An overheating vehicle is considered an emergency situation, so Regina should refer to Chapter VI, which covers emergencies in the car owner's manual. Chapter III focuses on Audio, Climate, and Voice Controls, which is not relevant to an overheating car. Chapter IV discusses Pre-Driving and Driving, which does not address overheating. Chapter I pertains to Vehicle Instruments and is not the appropriate chapter for handling an overheating car.
Passage 1: Fairy tales, fictional stories that involve magical occurrences and imaginary creatures like trolls, elves, giants, and talking animals, are fond in similar forms throughout the world. this occurs when a story with an origin in a particular location spreads geographically to, over time, far-flung lands. All variations of the same story must logically come form a single source. As language, ideas, and goods travel from place to place through the movement of peoples, stories the catch human imagination travel as well through human retelling. Passage 2: Fairy tales capture basic, fundamental human desires and fear. they represent the most essential form of fictionalized human experience: the bad characters are pure evil the good characters are pure good, the romance of royalty (and of commoners becoming royalty) is celebrated, etc. Given the nature of the fairy tale genre, it is not surprising that many different cultures come up with similar versions of the same essential story.
Which of the following is not an example of something the author of Passage 1 claims travels from place to place through human environment?
- A. Fairy tales
- B. Language
- C. Ideas
- D. Foods
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D: Foods. The author of Passage 1 mentions language, ideas, and goods as examples of things that travel from place to place through the movement of peoples. There is no mention of food in the passage as something that is spread through human interaction. Fairy tales, language, and ideas are specifically highlighted in the text as elements that are transmitted through human interaction. While foods can be exchanged between cultures, the passage does not discuss them in the context of spreading through human interaction, making it the correct answer. Choice A (Fairy tales), B (Language), and C (Ideas) are all supported by the text as examples of things that travel through human environments, unlike food.
Bobo the clown books more shows and makes more money than Gob the magician. Despite rampant coulrophobia "an irrational fear of clowns" Bobo still books more parties and receives higher rates of compensation per show. Gob's magic shows are no worse than Bobo's clown performances.
Why does Bobo, despite coulrophobia, book more shows and make more money than Gob?
- A. Bobo is an experienced clown.
- B. Despite rampant coulrophobia, statistical data shows that people generally prefer clowns to magicians for children's birthday parties.
- C. Bobo goes out of his way to appear non-threatening.
- D. Bobo works in a densely populated city, while Gob works in a rural town.
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B because despite the widespread fear of clowns (coulrophobia), statistical data indicates that people typically favor clowns over magicians for children's birthday parties. This preference results in Bobo booking more shows and earning more money than Gob. Choice A is incorrect because being an experienced clown alone does not address the paradox. Choice C is incorrect as the statement does not directly relate to the preference for clowns over magicians. Choice D is irrelevant to the paradox as the location of their work does not explain why Bobo is more successful despite coulrophobia.
Passage I
Lethal force, or deadly force, is defined as the physical means to cause death or serious harm to another individual. The law holds that lethal force is only accepted when you or another person are in immediate and unavoidable danger of death or severe bodily harm. For example, a person could be beating a weaker person in such a way that they are suffering severe enough trauma that could result in death or serious harm. This would be an instance where lethal force would be acceptable and possibly the only way to save that person from irrevocable damage.
Another example of when to use lethal force would be when someone enters your home with a deadly weapon. The intruder's presence and possession of the weapon indicate mal-intent and the ability to inflict death or severe injury to you and your loved ones. Again, lethal force can be used in this situation. Lethal force can also be applied to prevent the harm of another individual. If a woman is being brutally assaulted and is unable to fend off an attacker, lethal force can be used to defend her as a last-ditch effort. If she is in immediate jeopardy of rape, harm, and/or death, lethal force could be the only response that could effectively deter the assailant.
The key to understanding the concept of lethal force is the term last resort. Deadly force cannot be taken back; it should be used only to prevent severe harm or death. The law does distinguish whether the means of one's self-defense is fully warranted, or if the individual goes out of control in the process. If you continually attack the assailant after they are rendered incapacitated, this would be causing unnecessary harm, and the law can bring charges against you. Likewise, if you kill an attacker unnecessarily after defending yourself, you can be charged with murder. This would move lethal force beyond necessary defense, making it no longer a last resort but rather a use of excessive force.
Passage II
Assault is the unlawful attempt of one person to apply apprehension on another individual by an imminent threat or by initiating offensive contact. Assaults can vary, encompassing physical strikes, threatening body language, and even provocative language. In the case of the latter, even if a hand has not been laid, it is still considered an assault because of its threatening nature.
Let's look at an example: A homeowner is angered because his neighbor blows fallen leaves into his freshly mowed lawn. Irate, the homeowner gestures a fist to his fellow neighbor and threatens to bash his head in for littering on his lawn. The homeowner's physical motions and verbal threat heralds a physical threat against the other neighbor. These factors classify the homeowner's reaction as an assault. If the angry neighbor hits the threatening homeowner in retaliation, that would constitute an assault as well because he physically hit the homeowner.
Assault also centers on the involvement of weapons in a conflict. If someone fires a gun at another person, it could be interpreted as an assault unless the shooter acted in self-defense. If an individual drew a gun or a knife on someone with the intent to harm them, it would be considered assault. However, it's also considered an assault if someone simply aimed a weapon, loaded or not, at another person in a threatening manner.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the explanation proposed by the author in Passage I, third paragraph?
- A. An instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame. The law takes into account the necessary use of force at the time it is committed.
- B. An individual who uses necessary defense under lethal force is in direct compliance with the law under most circumstances.
- C. Lethal force in self-defense should not be forgiven in all cases for the peace of mind of the primary victim.
- D. The use of lethal force is not evaluated based on the intent of the user, but rather the severity of the primary attack that warranted self-defense.
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A because the author in Passage I discusses the concept of lethal force in self-defense being justified and absolved from blame when used as a last resort to prevent severe harm or death. Choice A undermines this by stating that an instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame and highlights that the law considers the necessary use of force at the time it is committed. This challenges the absolute justification of such actions and would seriously undermine the author's argument. Choice B is incorrect because compliance with the law does not necessarily address the justification and absolution of lethal force. Choice C is incorrect as forgiving lethal force in all cases is not the focus of the author's argument. Choice D is incorrect because the intent of the user is a crucial factor in evaluating the use of lethal force, contrary to what is stated.