Nokea
Which sentence avoids a comma splice?
- A. The wind howled, the branches swayed, and rain lashed against the windows.
- B. He packed his bags, checked the weather forecast, and then hit the road.
- C. The movie was entertaining; it was also thought-provoking.
- D. Tired and hungry, she stopped for a quick bite at the cafe.
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: Option C uses a semicolon to correctly separate the two independent clauses 'The movie was entertaining' and 'it was also thought-provoking.' This usage of a semicolon avoids a comma splice, which occurs when two independent clauses are incorrectly joined by a comma without a coordinating conjunction or appropriate punctuation. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because they all contain comma splices. In choice A, the comma splice is present between 'The wind howled' and 'the branches swayed.' In choice B, the comma splice occurs between 'He packed his bags' and 'checked the weather forecast.' Choice D has a comma splice between 'Tired and hungry' and 'she stopped for a quick bite at the cafe.'
You may also like to solve these questions
Which sentence uses the gerund (-ing) form correctly?
- A. My favorite activity is playing tennis.
- B. He enjoys traveling to new places.
- C. Reading a good book is relaxing.
- D. Writing is her passion.
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Option A correctly uses the gerund form 'playing' as the direct object of the verb 'is.' In option B, 'traveling' is used correctly as a gerund after 'enjoys.' Option C also correctly uses 'Reading' as a gerund at the beginning of the sentence. However, in option D, 'Writing' is used as a gerund, but it lacks context or a clear function for the -ing form in the sentence, unlike the other options. The gerund form should serve a purpose in the sentence structure, which is not evident in option D.
What type of sentence is the following: 'Wow, what a beautiful sunset!'?
- A. Interrogative sentence
- B. Declarative sentence
- C. Exclamatory sentence
- D. Imperative sentence
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The sentence 'Wow, what a beautiful sunset!' expresses strong emotion ('Wow') and conveys an exclamation, indicating that it is an exclamatory sentence. Exclamatory sentences are used to show strong feelings or emotions and typically end with an exclamation mark. Choice A, 'Interrogative sentence,' is incorrect because interrogative sentences ask questions, which this sentence does not. Choice B, 'Declarative sentence,' is incorrect because declarative sentences make statements or convey information, which is not the case here. Choice D, 'Imperative sentence,' is incorrect because imperative sentences give commands or instructions, which are not present in the given sentence.
Which sentence uses parentheses correctly?
- A. The suspect was seen driving a red car (a witness reported).
- B. The movie (released in 2022) received critical acclaim.
- C. The restaurant offers a variety of dishes (including vegetarian options).
- D. All participants (must register by Friday) will receive a free gift.
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The correct use of parentheses is to provide additional non-essential information to the main sentence. In option B, 'released in 2022' is additional detail about the movie but not necessary for the sentence's core meaning. Options A, C, and D could function without parentheses without affecting their essential message, making them incorrect uses of parentheses in this context. Therefore, choice B is the correct answer.
What figure of speech is used in the statement, 'His words were a dagger to my heart'?
- A. Metonymy
- B. Simile
- C. Metaphor
- D. Hyperbole
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C: Metaphor. The statement 'His words were a dagger to my heart' is a metaphor. A metaphor directly compares two unlike things by stating that one thing is another. In this case, the pain caused by his words is compared to a physical object, a dagger, emphasizing the intensity of the emotional impact. Choice A, Metonymy, is incorrect as metonymy involves substituting the name of one object with another closely related object. Choice B, Simile, is incorrect as a simile compares two things using 'like' or 'as,' which is not present in the given statement. Choice D, Hyperbole, is incorrect as hyperbole involves exaggeration for emphasis, which is not the case in the given statement.
Which word choice best fits the blank: 'Her research paper was riddled with _____ errors.'
- A. flagrant (obvious and inexcusable)
- B. cursory (superficial)
- C. innocuous (harmless)
- D. meticulous (carefully detailed)
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The word 'flagrant' in option A is the most appropriate choice for the blank because it conveys the idea of errors that are glaringly obvious and inexcusable. In this context, the research paper is described as being 'riddled with errors,' suggesting a significant amount of mistakes that stand out and are severe. Choice B, 'cursory,' meaning superficial, does not accurately describe the seriousness of the errors. Choice C, 'innocuous,' meaning harmless, is the opposite of what is implied by the sentence. Choice D, 'meticulous,' meaning carefully detailed, is the opposite of what is needed to describe errors in this context.