Nokea
Which of the following statements would make the best conclusion to an essay about civil rights activist Rosa Parks?
- A. Rosa Parks refused to give up her bus seat, leading to her arrest.
- B. Rosa Parks was a hero to many, symbolizing the power of ordinary people in bringing about change.
- C. Rosa Parks died in 2005 at the age of 92.
- D. Rosa Parks' actions sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a pivotal event in the Civil Rights Movement.
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The best conclusion to an essay about civil rights activist Rosa Parks should reflect her significance and impact. Choice A, while true, focuses on a specific event rather than summarizing her broader influence. Choice C, though factual, is not a strong conclusion as it does not capture the essence of her legacy. Choice D, although related to her actions, is not as encompassing as Choice B. Option B is the most suitable conclusion as it highlights Rosa Parks' heroism, emphasizing how she inspired change and symbolized the power of ordinary individuals in making a difference.
You may also like to solve these questions
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the explanation proposed by the author in Passage I, third paragraph?
- A. An instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame. The law takes into account the necessary use of force at the time it is committed.
- B. An individual who uses necessary defense under lethal force is in direct compliance with the law under most circumstances.
- C. Lethal force in self-defense should not be forgiven in all cases for the peace of mind of the primary victim.
- D. The use of lethal force is not evaluated based on the intent of the user, but rather the severity of the primary attack that warranted self-defense.
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A because the author in Passage I discusses the concept of lethal force in self-defense being justified and absolved from blame when used as a last resort to prevent severe harm or death. Choice A undermines this by stating that an instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame and highlights that the law considers the necessary use of force at the time it is committed. This challenges the absolute justification of such actions and would seriously undermine the author's argument. Choice B is incorrect because compliance with the law does not necessarily address the justification and absolution of lethal force. Choice C is incorrect as forgiving lethal force in all cases is not the focus of the author's argument. Choice D is incorrect because the intent of the user is a crucial factor in evaluating the use of lethal force, contrary to what is stated.
If Cynthia wants to pick the meal where there would be the least options for her and fellow vegetarians, during what meal should she bring the platter?
- A. Breakfast
- B. Lunch
- C. Cocktail hour
- D. Dinner
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: Dinner has the least vegetarian options, making it the most suitable meal for Cynthia to bring her platter. The dinner menu includes Roasted pork loin, seared trout, and bacon-bit topped macaroni and cheese, which are all non-vegetarian dishes. Breakfast, Lunch, and Cocktail hour all have vegetarian options available, making them less suitable for Cynthia's vegetarian platter.
What is one point on which the scientist and politician agree?
- A. Burning fossil fuels causes global temperatures to rise.
- B. Global temperatures are increasing.
- C. Countries must revisit their energy policies before it's too late.
- D. Earth's climate naturally goes through warming and cooling periods.
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B: 'Global temperatures are increasing.' The scientist and politician both agree on this point based on the context provided. Choice A is incorrect because while it might be a common belief among scientists, the politician's agreement is not explicitly mentioned. Choice C is incorrect as it suggests a course of action rather than a point of agreement. Choice D is incorrect as it contradicts the consensus that global temperatures are currently increasing due to human activities, not just natural climate cycles.
Which of the following is a logical conclusion that can be derived from the announcement above?
- A. The library is planning to purchase more computers to accommodate longer usage.
- B. The library is facing budget cuts and implementing the fee to compensate for them.
- C. The library has added the fee to discourage patrons from spending too long on the computers.
- D. The library is covering its Internet service costs by passing on the fee to patrons.
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The logical conclusion that can be derived from the announcement is that the library has added the fee to discourage patrons from spending too long on the computers. This conclusion is supported by the fact that the library is limiting computer usage to 30 minutes and implementing a fee for extended use. Choice A is incorrect because there is no indication in the announcement that the library plans to purchase more computers. Choice B is incorrect as there is no mention of budget cuts or using the fee to compensate for them in the announcement. Choice D is incorrect as there is no information in the announcement about the library covering its Internet service costs by passing on the fee to patrons.
Which of the following can be logically inferred from the passage?
- A. The Vikings disliked exploring the New World.
- B. Leif Erikson's banishment led to his exploration of Canada.
- C. Leif Erikson never shared his stories with the King of Norway.
- D. Historians have difficulty pinpointing events in Viking history.
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D. It can be inferred from the passage that historians have difficulty definitively pinpointing Viking historical events. The passage highlights the uncertainty around Leif Erikson's birth year, conflicting accounts of interactions with natives, and the lack of clarity regarding specific events in Viking history. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect. There is no indication in the passage that the Vikings disliked exploring the New World; Leif Erikson's banishment did not directly lead to his exploration of Canada but rather his desire to spread Christianity and find new lands; and there is no mention of Leif Erikson not sharing his stories with the King of Norway.