Based on the evidence found, electrical stimulation may be a potential therapy for OSAS, warranting further clinical trial. Which type of document is this sentence most likely from?
- A. Motivational speech
- B. Business memo
- C. Scientific journal article
- D. Personal blog
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The sentence discusses evidence and clinical trials related to a specific therapy, indicating a scientific context. Scientific journal articles are known for presenting research findings, discussing evidence, and proposing further studies, making them the most suitable source for this type of information. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because a motivational speech is more focused on inspiring and encouraging, a business memo typically deals with internal communication in organizations, and a personal blog reflects individual opinions or experiences, none of which align with the content and tone of the sentence provided.
You may also like to solve these questions
Which example uses correct punctuation?
- A. "I really can't make it," he answered, "you should probably go without me."
- B. "I really can't make it," he answered. "you should probably go without me."
- C. "I really can't make it," he answered. "You should probably go without me."
- D. "I really can't make it," he answered, "you should probably go without me."
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Choice A uses proper dialogue punctuation. The comma appears inside the closing quotation mark after 'make it,' and 'you' remains lowercase because it continues the same sentence. In Choice B, there is a period instead of a comma after 'answered,' breaking the sentence incorrectly. Choice C incorrectly places the comma outside the quotation mark after 'make it.' Choice D, similar to Choice B, uses a period instead of a comma after 'answered,' leading to incorrect punctuation.
Which word in the following sentence is a homophone of 'I'll'?
- A. Me
- B. Aisle
- C. I'm
- D. Ill
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: 'Aisle' is the correct answer. A homophone is a word that is pronounced the same as another word but has a different meaning or spelling. In this sentence, 'I'll' is a homophone of 'aisle' as they sound the same but have distinct definitions and spellings. Choices A, C, and D do not fit the criteria of being homophones of 'I'll'.
Based on an examination of word parts, which of the following words means 'abnormality of movement'?
- A. Dyskinesia
- B. Hyperkinesia
- C. Akinesia
- D. Hypokinesia
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is 'Dyskinesia.' By breaking down the word parts, 'dys-' means difficult or abnormal, and '-kinesia' refers to movement. Therefore, 'Dyskinesia' means an abnormality of movement. Choice B, 'Hyperkinesia,' is incorrect as 'hyper-' means excessive, not abnormal. Choice C, 'Akinesia,' is incorrect as 'a-' means without, not abnormal. Choice D, 'Hypokinesia,' is incorrect as 'hypo-' means deficient, not abnormal.
Knitting is my favorite hobby... Which of the following sentences does not fit with the rest of the paragraph above?
- A. There are other benefits of knitting, too.
- B. The repetition of stitch after stitch is so relaxing.
- C. A ball of wool holds so much potential and is also a sustainable resource.
- D. It helped me.
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The sentence about the ball of wool being a sustainable resource introduces a new idea that doesn't align with the other ideas in the paragraph, which focus on relaxation and health benefits. Choices A, B, and D all relate to the positive aspects and personal experience with knitting, which are in line with the paragraph's context. Choice A expands on the benefits of knitting, choice B highlights the relaxing nature of the activity, and choice D indicates a personal benefit obtained from knitting.
When a researcher submits a paper for publication in a scientific journal, the editors give it to other scientists to review. Which of the following options best uses grammar to combine the sentences above for clarity?
- A. When a researcher submits a paper for publication in a scientific journal, the editors give it to other scientists to review.
- B. The editors give it to other scientists after a researcher submits a paper for publication in a scientific journal, and they review it.
- C. A researcher submits a paper for publication in a scientific journal, and then the scientists review the paper because the editors gave it to other scientists.
- D. The scientists review the paper after the editors give it to them when a researcher submits a paper for publication in a scientific journal.
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A: "When a researcher submits a paper for publication in a scientific journal, the editors give it to other scientists to review." This option provides a clear and concise way to combine the two sentences. It maintains the logical sequence of events: first, the researcher submits the paper, and then the editors pass it to other scientists for review.
Option B introduces unnecessary complexity by separating the actions in a less fluid manner. Option C confuses the sequence of events by implying that the scientists review the paper because the editors already gave it to them, which is not the intended order of actions. Option D also disrupts the chronological order of events by placing the scientists' review before the editors give them the paper, making it less clear and accurate compared to the correct answer, option A.