Nokea
The length of a coaching session should be no longer than:
- A. 15 minutes.
- B. 60 minutes.
- C. 10 minutes.
- D. 30 minutes.
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C: 10 minutes. The rationale is that coaching sessions are most effective when kept concise and focused. A shorter duration helps maintain the participant's attention and ensures key points are covered without overwhelming them. Longer sessions can lead to decreased engagement and retention. Choice A (15 minutes) is slightly longer and may still risk losing focus. Choices B (60 minutes) and D (30 minutes) are too lengthy for a coaching session, increasing the likelihood of information overload and decreased effectiveness.
You may also like to solve these questions
You believe that you are working harder than other nurses and that you take care of patients that are more complex. You are angry that other staff nurses have less complex and lower acuity patients, but you __________ .
- A. Avoid discussing the situation because you do not want to be perceived as a complainer.
- B. Know that you need to discuss the inequity with the nurse manager because you are resenting the work and becoming more dissatisfied in your job
- C. A & B
- D. None of the above
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C. This is because both options A and B are valid courses of action in this scenario. Option A suggests avoiding discussing the situation to prevent being seen as a complainer, which can be a mature approach to handle the situation diplomatically. Option B emphasizes the importance of addressing the inequity with the nurse manager to prevent increasing dissatisfaction with the job. By choosing option C, you can combine the benefits of both approaches, addressing the issue with the nurse manager while also maintaining professionalism and avoiding unnecessary conflict with colleagues.
The ANA is a registered labor organization, but it does not engage in direct __________.
- A. Empower union affiliation
- B. Reward union affiliation
- C. Encourage union affiliation
- D. Collective bargaining
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D: Collective bargaining. The American Nurses Association (ANA) is a professional organization representing nurses, not a labor union. Therefore, it does not engage in direct collective bargaining on behalf of its members. Collective bargaining is the process of negotiation between employers and employees, typically labor unions, to determine wages, working conditions, and other terms of employment. The other choices (A, B, C) are incorrect because the ANA focuses on professional development, advocacy, and promoting the interests of nurses rather than traditional labor union activities like empowering, rewarding, or encouraging union affiliation.
A client with limited mobility in their lower extremities is at risk for skin breakdown. Which of the following actions should the nurse take to prevent skin breakdown?
- A. Place the client in high-Fowler's position.
- B. Increase the client's intake of carbohydrates.
- C. Massage areas of skin that are darker than the surrounding skin tissue with unscented lotion.
- D. Have the client use a trapeze bar when changing position
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B: Increase the client's intake of carbohydrates. Adequate nutrition, including carbohydrates, is essential for skin health and wound healing. Carbohydrates provide energy for the body's healing processes. Skin breakdown can be prevented by ensuring the client has a well-balanced diet.
A: Placing the client in high-Fowler's position is not directly related to preventing skin breakdown in this scenario.
C: Massaging areas of skin that are darker than the surrounding skin tissue with lotion may cause more harm than good, as it can increase the risk of skin breakdown.
D: Having the client use a trapeze bar when changing position is important for mobility but does not directly address the prevention of skin breakdown.
Which of the following is an example of a clinical decision support system (CDSS)?
- A. Electronic health record (EHR)
- B. Barcode medication administration
- C. Smart infusion pumps
- D. Automated drug dispensing system
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C: Smart infusion pumps. A smart infusion pump is an example of a CDSS as it helps healthcare providers in administering medications accurately by providing alerts, dosage calculations, and other decision support tools. This system enhances patient safety and clinical outcomes.
Incorrect choices:
A: Electronic health record (EHR) - While EHRs store and manage patient health information, they do not provide decision support features like CDSS.
B: Barcode medication administration - While barcoding helps in verifying medication administration, it is not a CDSS that provides clinical decision support.
D: Automated drug dispensing system - While these systems help in dispensing medications accurately, they do not provide clinical decision support tools like smart infusion pumps do.
What is the main purpose of a utilization review?
- A. Evaluate patient outcomes
- B. Ensure compliance with regulations
- C. Reduce hospital readmissions
- D. Assess financial impact
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The main purpose of a utilization review is to evaluate patient outcomes. This process involves assessing the appropriateness, necessity, and quality of healthcare services provided to patients. By evaluating patient outcomes, healthcare providers can ensure that patients receive effective and efficient care, leading to better health outcomes.
Choice B (Ensure compliance with regulations) is incorrect because while utilization review may involve ensuring compliance with regulations, it is not the primary purpose of the process.
Choice C (Reduce hospital readmissions) is incorrect as reducing hospital readmissions is a specific goal within healthcare quality improvement initiatives, but it is not the main purpose of utilization review.
Choice D (Assess financial impact) is incorrect as while financial considerations may play a role in utilization review, the primary focus is on evaluating patient outcomes rather than financial implications.