The physician has ordered a 2-gram sodium diet for a client with hypertension. Which food should be limited due to its sodium content?
- A. Potato chips
- B. Baked chicken
- C. Steamed broccoli
- D. Fresh apple
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Potato chips are high in sodium often 120-180 mg per ounce exceeding a 2-gram (2000 mg) daily limit for hypertension, necessitating restriction to control blood pressure. Baked chicken, steamed broccoli, and fresh apples have minimal natural sodium, fitting the diet. Nurses educate clients on hidden sodium in processed snacks, promoting fresh alternatives to reduce cardiovascular strain, aligning with therapeutic goals for long-term health management.
You may also like to solve these questions
When an LVN/LPN is working for a health-care organization that has professional liability insurance, the nurse needs to base a decision on whether to buy individual professional liability insurance on which of the following things?
- A. the possibility that the organization could countersue the nurse in a lawsuit
- B. the cost of professional liability insurance to the nurse
- C. the amount and type of coverage the health-care organization carries
- D. the number of hours worked and the type of nursing work
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Deciding whether to purchase individual professional liability insurance as an LVN/LPN involves weighing personal risk, and the possibility of the organization countersuing the nurse in a lawsuit is a critical factor. Organizational insurance typically covers nurses acting within their scope, but if a lawsuit arises and the organization's interests diverge such as alleging nurse negligence they might countersue to deflect liability. Individual insurance provides independent protection, ensuring legal defense and coverage tailored to the nurse's needs. Cost, organizational coverage, and work hours are relevant but secondary; cost affects feasibility, coverage might leave gaps, and hours or work type influence risk but don't address the specific threat of a countersuit. This choice emphasizes proactive self-protection in a litigious environment, safeguarding the nurse's career and finances.
Which of the following statement best describe beneficence?
- A. Doing good for the client
- B. Fairness and equality
- C. Respecting client's decision
- D. Keeping promises
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Beneficence is doing good for the client (A), per ethics acting in their best interest (e.g., pain relief). Fairness (B) is justice, decision respect (C) autonomy, promises (D) fidelity. A best captures beneficence's intent, making it correct.
A framework for health assessment that evaluates the effects of stressors to the mind, body and environment in relation with the ability of the client to perform ADL.
- A. Functional health framework
- B. Head to toe framework
- C. Body system framework
- D. Cephalocaudal framework
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Functional health framework (A) assesses stressors on mind, body, and environment re: ADLs, per Gordon's model. Head-to-toe (B), body system (C), and cephalocaudal (D) focus physical order, not function. A matches description, making it correct.
Roger has been seen agitated, shouting and running. As Nurse Aida approaches, he shouts and swear, calling Aida names. Nurse Aida told Roger 'That is an unacceptable behavior Roger, Stop and go to your room now.' The situation is most likely in what phase of NPR?
- A. Pre Orientation
- B. Orientation
- C. Working
- D. Termination
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: This scenario fits the Working phase (C). Roger's agitation and Aida's response setting boundaries suggest an established relationship where interventions address behaviors. Pre-Orientation (A) is pre-contact, Orientation (B) builds trust, not confrontation, and Termination (D) ends care. In Peplau's Working phase, the nurse actively helps the client manage issues, as Aida does here, making C the likely phase.
You are the nurse working with an elderly, competent client who refuses a vitamin B injection ordered by the physician. The family insists that this injection be given, and you give it while the client is objecting. Even though the client improves, the client contacts a lawyer. From your knowledge of nursing and the law, you realize that you:
- A. did the right thing because the client improved.
- B. should have had the family put their request in writing.
- C. have commited an assault against the client.
- D. have committed an act of battery against the client.
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: Administering a vitamin B injection to a competent client who refuses it, despite family insistence and subsequent improvement, constitutes battery. Battery is the unlawful physical contact with a person without consent, and in healthcare, consent is a fundamental right for competent adults. The client's objection overrides family wishes, and giving the injection violates autonomy, a core ethical principle. The outcome of improvement doesn't justify the action legally or ethically. Assault involves threatening harm, whereas battery is the act itself, making this the correct classification. Getting family requests in writing or focusing on the outcome doesn't negate the lack of consent. This scenario underscores the importance of respecting patient rights and the legal consequences of disregarding them, even with good intentions.